Golublog: An Anthropology Blog

Just. One. Column.

Category: academia

Andre Gunder Frank is dead

by Alex

“Andre”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Gunder_Frank “Gunder”:http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/10/034.html “Frank”:http://rrojasdatabank.info/agfrank/ passed away yesterday. The email that I was forwarded from his family recounts:

bq. Dear friends and colleagues of Gunder’s. We are writing to let you know that Gunder died early this morning. He fought cancer with great courage, and was still working until two weeks ago, though in recent weeks he worked fewer and fewer hours every day because of pain and exhaustion. He worked with more strength and determination than we have the words to tell – until his body gave up. In the last couple of days, all he could do was to hold our hands. In the last three days, we have received more than a thousand e-mail messages of condolence, remembrance, and friendship from friends and colleagues of Gunder’s all over the world. Paul has tried to answer each message individually. Please forgive us if we don’t reply to each message we receive in response to this. We, Gunder’s family, will have a small gathering to express our love for Gunder before he is cremated on Tuesday afternoon, April 26 in the Luxembourg crematory. Friends and colleagues who wish or are able to attend are welcome to come. We know from hundreds of messages that most friends who would like to be here will not be able to travel on such short notice.

While I was never very deeply immersed in his work, I knew of Frank by reputation and had read some of his articles — ReOrient has been a book I’ve been meaning to read for some time due to my general interest in macro-history. My condolences to Frank’s family and colleagues.

Latour is so 2003

by Alex

One of the great things about going to the Fashioning Anthropology Conference is that I had the opportunity to gossip endlessly about theory. I have mixed feelings about anthropology’s couture-like obsession with continental philosophy. To wit, when the hot new theorist is someone I’ve read a lot of, I imagine anthropology as a richly philosophical and important discipline. When I’ve never heard of them, I feel like anthropology is drifting away from its roots in ‘real social science’ and should stop making me read people I don’t care for. For the record, the feeling that I’ve been getting more and more from people is that Latour is over as an athropological fad. There are a variety of reasons for this, I suppose. And of course now that he is ‘over’ we will still be reading articles influenced by him for the next five years. However, I’m guessing that we will see the slow ascension of “Giorgio”:http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=437 “Agamben”:http://www.egs.edu/faculty/agamben.html to the heights of theoretical chic in at least some circles. So snap up your copy of Homo Sacer and start reading — all the cool kids will be doing it soon.

Major Anglophone Departments as Fashion Brands

by Alex

Another Good Thing that happened at the Fashioning Anthropology conference.

Major Anglophone Anthropology Departments as Fashion Brands

By Thomas Strong

Department

High Concept

Low Concept

Harvard

Armani: safe, boring

J Crew: Safe, boring

Michigan

Donna Karan (until Rubin arrives): sells well sometimes

Patagonia: earnest, ecological aura

Berkeley

Gucci: a house divided

Gap Corp: Banana Republic (Rabinow, Cohen, Pandolfo), Old Navy (Scheper-Hughes, Nader); Competing revenue streams

Chicago

Louis Viutton: well-made, but would rather be hip

Levi’s: Standard-bearer, bleeding market-share to Diesel

Cambridge

Burberry: difficult, would rather (not) be hip

Paul Frank: goofy and inscrutable, anglophilic

Columbia

Christian Dior (Galliano): revived, rich, “post-colonial”

Diesel: hip, but would rather be well-made; ascendant

Rice

Prada: Modernist or not? (Faubion)

Virginia

Alexander McQueen for Givenchy: sometimes bizarre

UCSD

Alexander McQueen for Givenchy: pretty Freudian

ANU

Chanel Cruise Collection: respectable but breezy

Billabong: for obvious reasons

Stanford

Vera Wang and/or Narciso Rodriguez

Fashioning Anthropology: Papers in honor of Gail Kelly

by Alex

You know for a blog that is purportedly centered on anthropology, I spend remarkably little time talking about what I actually do. Along with Thomas ‘Strong Thomas’ Strong, I’ll be in Portland, Oregon next weekend where we are organizing a conference in honor of our undergraduate advisor entitled “Fashioning Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Gail Kelly”:http://web.reed.edu/gailkelly/. We have a number of very well known people giving papers: James Faubion, Joel Robbins, Jill Dubisch, Steven William Foster, Dennis MacGilvray. Dell Hymes wanted to come but I think he is not as mobile these days as he used to be. Steven Nugent was also in the queue, but you know London to Portland is a _long_ way to go for a weekend.

I am never quite sure what to make of my education at Reed. It was, by the standards of most anthropology programs, incredibly regressive. My ‘anthropological theory class’ started with _The Andaman Islanders_ (which we read in its entirety) and ended with _Political Systems of Highland Burma_. To this day when I hear that people are assigning Foucault in Intro Anthropology courses I often wonder alound why they don’t assign Durkheim. Many of my class mates consider me hopelessly backwards for preferring to read Levi-Strauss, Mauss, and Halbwachs to Deleuze, Latour, and Virillio. However, at the same time they often express an appreciation for the depth of my knowledge of anthropology’s history. How can you expect to get one and not the other?

Most of the time I find this puzzling. However, since Professor Kelly was notorious opinionated and intolerant, I am planning on having a great time writing a completely unfair and imbalanced spleen-venting screed against the excesses of contemporary ‘theory’. Now that the 90s are over I can finally tell everyone exactly what I think of ‘resistance’ and ‘hegemony’ as adequate analytical concepts. Feel free to drop by if you’re in that neck of the woods.

The less-screedy version will show up on this website at some point. In fact, Tom and I have tentative plans for a disgustingly progressive publish-on-demand creative commons type festschrift.

RSS Feeds for Journals

by Alex

That’s what I want. Exactly like Bloglines (not citeulike or delicious, where you find articles and tage them), but with academic journals instead of blogs. I’d have different folders for different things I’m interested in, and every month or quarter or year or whatever I’d get the title and abstract of each article on the table of contents as a separate entry.

Has this been done yet?

To CV, or not to CV….

by Alex

… That is the question. Should I include one on this site? Academic believe information should be free — unless it should be a deep, dark secret. I know people who hand out off prints left and right to all comers but then stonewall mightily when asked for CVs or even — secret of secret! — _syllabi_. Partially this is a reflex from the bad old days when all we had was treeware and information circulated differently. However, I sometimes feel it’s also the result of an astute appreciation of the Ivory Tower’s business model: publish stuff as wide as possible to drive up demand for teaching, which is what you actually make a living on. We’re kinda like Wilco that way — we give up the CD for free, but please _please_ come to our shows.

Anyway, there is really an art to the CV. You have the really, _really_ long one sitting on your hard drive, and then you appropriately edit for your audience depending on the occasion. So once again we encounter the old problem with living a world-readable life on the intarweb: the positive side is that you reach a huge audience because literally _everyone_ reads about your life. The negative side is that you reach a huge audience because literally _everyone_ reads about your life.

I suppose my feeling is putting a CV on the website would give people a chance to evaluate my writing (for instance, in the recent spate of postings on race) in the context of my career and professional authority. To the extent I’m proud of what I’ve done, this seems like a good idea. To the extent that I feel like I could be a harder worker and more successful person, then it seems like a bad idea.

What do you think, is the bio on my “about page”:http://alex.golub.name/log/?page_id=355 enough?

At 504 403

by Alex

Well it is official. My dissertation is now over 500 pages long. This means spell checking it take twelve frickin’ hours. Great. I am a moron in formatting. My dissertation is over 400 pages long when the “do not split paragraph across page break” box is unchecked. This means that spell checking it takes ten frickin’ hours. Great.

The upside is that my defense is now officially set of ‘sometime in June’. I need to spellcheck one more chapter and then send it off. I’ll do that today. Then I have six more weeks to revise two more chapters. Tick tock tick tock…

At 475

by Alex

I’ve just finished revising the third chapter of my dissertation. I have six chapters in my dissertation, so finishing the third means that I am half way through. The page count at the moment is 475 pages. It will most likely grow to 500 by the time I am done. Given my progress my committee is tentatively planning to have me send the last chapter in on 1 May and then defend in mid-May at some point. Depending on scheduling — and my ability to do good work — we may or may not have to wait until the fall. Right now I am just excited that it is coming along so well.

I admit: Kerim Friedman

by Alex

Kerim Friedman, the author of “the keywords blog”:http://keywords.oxus.net/ has posted his recently-completed diss for all and sundry to scrutinize. “Learning “Local” Languages: Passive Revolution, Language Markets, and Aborigine Education in Taiwan.”:http://kerim.oxus.net/contents/learning-local-languages/ looks to be very interesting, particularly for a half-sinophile household such as mine. There’s a nod to Bambi Schieffelin in the acknowledgements which sort of tells you where he’s coming from.

Gratz on leveling Kerim! Hopefully I’ll be doing the same before too long.

Random Anthro Homepages

by Alex

“Peter Pels”:http://leidsewetenschappers.leidenuniv.nl/show_en.php3?medewerker_id=768 and “George Gmelch”:http://www.union.edu/PUBLIC/ANTDEPT/ggmelch.htm

Articles by both of them are in my queue. Someday, someday I’ll have time to read again.

I give them massive head acks

by Alex

From a student in my latest Intro Anthro course:

!http://alex.golub.name/pics/wanted2.jpg!

Real Artists Ship

by Alex

I’ve changed the motto in this blog’s masthead to reflect the fact that the date of my dissertation defense is now written, if not in stone, than in very very hard plastic and is only two and a half months away. Dissertations are complex documents — mine is now 375 pages long — and finishing them is so deeply entwined with your psychologicla well-being and professional progress that opening that black box of your psyche and looking inside in order to figure out ‘how you feel about your dissertation’ simply doesn’t make sense.

Better to just focus on the finish line. I’ve always liked Steve Levy’s charming little book _Insanely Great_ on the history of the creation of the first Macintosh, and I’ve now adopted Steve Jobs’s motto as my own. As Levy writes:

Jobs’s speeches were punctuated by slogans. Perhaps the most telling epigram of all was a three-word koan that Jobs scrawled on an easel in January 1983, when the project [the release of the first Mac] was months overdue. REAL ARTISTS SHIP. It was an awesome encapsulation of the ground rules in the age of technological expression. The term “starving artist” was now an oxymoron. One’s creation, quite simply, did not exist as art if it was not out there, available for consumption, doing well. Was [Douglas] Engelbart an artist? A prima donna — _he didn’t ship._ What were the wizards of PARC? Haughty aristocrats — _they didn’t ship._ The final step of an artist — the single validating act — was geting his or her work into boxes, at which point the marketing guys take over. Once you get the computers into people’s homes, you have penetrated their minds. At that point all the clever design decisions you made, all the tists and turns of the interface, the subtle dance of mode and modeless, the menu bars and trash cans and mouse buttons and everything else inside and outside your creation, becomes part of people’s lives, transforms their working habits, permeates their approach to their labor, and ultimately, their lives.

But to do that, to make a difference in the world and a dent in the universe, you had to ship. You had to ship. You had to ship.

Real artists ship.

Hot Hot Ethnographies

by Alex

Let’s assume that you had, say, a c-note to spend at Amazon.com and you just moved to a city which, while a regional center, is not as centrally located to the throbbing, gristly heart of your discipline as the Major Research University you just left. Which ethnographies/theoretical works would you put on your wishlist? Reply in the comments, please.

Typically I think that if you keep your ear to the ground there is a sense — often unspoken — that there are certain ethnographies that everyone is reading. I still remember that disastrous year in the mid-1990s when everyone at the AAAs thought that The Magical State was the most perfect book ever written. Luckily that didn’t last too long. (I don’t mean to suggest it’s a bad book — just that it’s long and difficult to read if you’re not really really interested in Venezuela and that uniquely South American preoccupation with Marx that pops up from time to time). However anthropologists have this sort of hipster indie-rock thing going on — they always want to be the people who read the book first, before it got featured on NPR and everyone read it. So it’s often difficult to get people to ‘fess up.

This makes it difficult to get a clear sense of where the field is going. However it is understandable — a lot of the hip books have trouble standing up to the test of time, when three years from now the international trade in organs isn’t a cause celebre and people wonder why the editor at the press didn’t seem to spellcheck the manuscript. So you don’t want to back a flash in the pan, or be ‘one of those people who was so into ethnography of the homeless back in 2000.’ (again: these are examples. There is good work on both homeless and organ traffic).

So… what have you been reading lately?

Correction to Virtual Worlds Syllabus

by Alex

In an earlier version of my Anthropology of Virtual Worlds syllabus I incorrectly attributed the pieces “bow, nigger” and “possessing Barbie” to Jim Rossignol when they were in fact by always_black, who runs the the website (wait for it) alwaysblack.com. Sorry for the confusion, AB. It’s a good site and if you haven’t yet read Bow, nigger you should definitely check it out.

Journal of Computer Mediated Communication

by Alex

I’m probably The Last One On The Block To Hear About This, but The Journal of Computer Mediated Communication has tons of interesting stuff like The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Invidualism. The current issue has a few articles on virtual communities too.

Ta Moko

by Alex

Ta Moko: Culture, body modification and the psychology of identity. A website from the Maori and Psychological Research Unit of Waikato University. They have a list of publications as well. If you are interested in Polynesian tatooing but don’t have time to wade through Wrapping in Images by Alfred Gell (link to PDF), then this might tickle your fancy. There’s also a brief bibliography with less-technical work included if you’d be interested in that.

UPDATE: Body Art: Marks of Identity is the AMNH’s website for the exhibit that produced Marks of Civilization. Artlink had a 1996 issue on Indigenous Art in the Pacific which looks cool in itself, but which also has an article entitled ‘Polynesian Tatooing: A Shift in Meaning’ by Karen Stevenson. Other authors include Michael Mel (!) and Barry Craig.

Working on Chapter Four

by Alex

It is a little amazing to me to realize that the bibliography of my dissertation is longer than most of papers that I wrote in College. Too. Many. Books.

My favorite line from chapter four is “Indeed, the success of George Murdock’s program for the scientific study of kinship is perhaps best indicated by the fact that his most well-known student was David Schneider.” Trust me – it’s real funny.

The Black Apollo

by Alex

Before coffee, my dissertation was like a massive battlestation and the torpedos of my intellect simply impacted on the surface. After coffee I type happily away, convinced that the dissertation has the potential to be New and Important and Well Written.

Before coffee, I despair of reading more academic essays and despise the jargon that drips off their pages. After copy I cruise through a couple of pages of Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life and hit the lines: “But in general the most robust and effective metapragmatic function is implicit, not denotationally explicit. It resides in cotextual organization itself, that is, in token cooccurrence patterns of emergent entextualization itself, that transcend, encompass, and supersede any denotationally literal metapragmatic discourse that may happen to manifest simultaneously in the place of denotational function.” and I’m like: “hells yes – goddamn right it does!”

Warm nights, winds full of flower scent, and iced coffee running through my veins. I’m on a roll.

Diss Outline

by Alex

(for the record, this is what all the fuss is about):

Dissertation Outline for
Making The Ipili Feasible: Imagining ‘Global’ and ‘Local’ Actors
at the Porgera Gold Mine, Enga Province, Papua New Guinea

by Alex Golub

This dissertation concerns the Ipili speaking people of Porgera valley, Papua New Guinea. In 1939 The Ipili were discovered by the Australian administration of Papua New Guinea and small-scale gold mining began in the valley shortly thereafter. In 1990, Porgera became home to the third largest goldmine in the world, which is operated by the Canadian mining transnational Placer Dome. Royalties and other revenues from the mine are key to the financial stability of the Papua New Guinean state. The Ipili have obtained hundreds of millions of dollars in concessions from both the government and Placer Dome in exchange for their willingness to host the mine on their land.

How, this dissertation asks, did stakeholders in the mine work together to create the complex social, economic, and political circumstances required to keep a large-scale mechanized gold mine operative in a remote geographical area? Just as mineral resources are ‘feasible’ if they meet complex logistical and financial requirements, this dissertation argues that Ipili identity itself has also been made ‘feasible’. On the one hand, representations of Ipili people and life in Porgera have been created and circulate in such a way that the moral and legal requirements of Ipili assent to the mine’s presence are met. On the other hand, the creation of these representations has, unexpectedly, given Ipili true agency to pursue their own agenda at a national level – they have become ‘feasible’ (in the sense of efficacious) political actors in the national level, and have become some of the most successful indigenous people in the world at extracting concessions from industry and government. In sum, the goal of the dissertation is to tie a semiotic account of the creation of representations of ‘local’ and ‘global’ actors to a political-economic account of power politics within a contemporary Pacific nation.

The dissertation is organized in a roughly chronological fashion. The first substantive chapter focuses on the early history of Porgera, and the development of a set of political and institutional arrangements that lead to the creation of the Porgera Gold mine in 1990. The dissertation then goes on to examine the historical consciousness of Ipili people – their own culturally specific understandings of mining, their contact with the outside world, and their role in it. Two chapters then examine how notions of being Ipili circulate. One chapter examines the way that people living in Porgera claim to have local Ipili identity in order to gain access to a variety of goods and services. The next examines how governmental and policy elites in the national capital of Port Moresby imagine ‘traditional Papua New Guinea culture’. The final chapter draws on what has come before to provide a close examination of a prolonged set of negotiations between Ipili leaders and mine representatives. This detailed ethnographic case demonstrates the dynamics of Porgera today and, in doing so, closes the dissertation.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
Overview of dissertation and its main arguments. Description of the fieldwork site and the problems involved. Discussion of the framework used in the analysis to follow, organized as a series of literature reviews: Language, politics, and performance in the Pacific, indigenous identity and the law, mining and resource issues, the literature on ‘alternate modernities’, the ‘indigenization of modernity’ and globalization

2. The History of Feasibility
A history of the valley focused on the history of the representation of a) the Ipili as an ethnic group and b) the Porgera Intrusive Complex (i.e. the ore body). This is presented as an argument against James Scott’s work on ‘seeing like a state’. A history of how whites have come to know the Ipili.

3. The Original Affluent Society: An Organization of Predatory Expansion
A discussion of Ipili conceptions of whites and their historical consciousness as a recently contacted people. History of millenarianism, Christianity, and mining. A discussion of how Ipili perceive whites – sometimes more accurately than we perceive ourselves. A history of how Porgerans have come to know whites.

4. Being Ipili in Porgera
One of the main chapters of the dissertation, which examines the politics and dynamics of claims to Ipili identities in the Valley today. Case studies will include: personal disputes between Ipili in relocation settlements, claims of damaged land made to mine employees, claims to royalty payments made to the government, and claims to be recognized as ‘leaders’ made in attempts to participate in negotiations.

5. Policy and Ambiguity
An analysis of how local landowners are viewed in Port Moresby. Government legislation and policy. How white and coastal industry executives imagine ‘traditional land tenure’. A discussion of the history of anthropological approaches to residence and descent and how these apply to policy. A discussion of how, in light of the rest of the dissertation, the assumptions used in decisions at the national level are not only inaccurate but dysfunctional.

6. The Yakatabari Negotiations
This final section tracks an 18-month long negotiation between Mine employees and Ipili leaders. This detailed case study will employ the material that has come before in the chapter in order to provide a concrete example of the fundamental issues of the dissertation as they played out in one particular situation.

7. Conclusion
Discussion of main themes of the dissertation and recapitulation of its arguments.

Dissertation Dead Ends (a typology)

by Alex

When I am working on my dissertation there are three different ways that I dead-end – that is, where I come to a place in my dissertation that I just lack the energy and drive to confront and overcome. This is bad, because I am now at a point where I’ve got to overcome every night if my dissertation is going to get to the church on time.

1) Data Dearth: I know what I want to say and how I want to prove it, but doing so involves a lot of going through notes and collating sources, which is exhausting. Also, as usual, it raises the usual self doubt about myself as a fieldworker which is not as big a deal as it once was, given the fact that I recognize intellectually I’m a perfectly decent fieldworker and its just the howling fantods that make me think I’m not.

2) Unzipping ideas: I’ve written some incredibly compact idea down in a paragraph. It’s actually three or four pages long (or a whole career long) but I’ve only been able to articulate it in its most compressed form. Unpacking involves saying what I think and explaining it (in draft) to myself and then (in revision) in a form readable to others. But doing this is exhausting and can make you insane in the membrane. Also, it means you have to start comparing your idea to all the other ones out there – its similarities and differences with all its sister ideas on the conceptual family tree. And this then leads to general despair of either 1) saying something that someone famous hasn’t already said first or 2) saying something right where someone famous has said something almost right but isn’t right and you want the world to know what’s right but of course they won’t because the other guy is famous and you’re just some schmoe working on the diss until your endurance breaks and you lapse into the sweet arms of Knights of the Old Republic.

3) Structure freeze: Gah! There are seven ideas. I have them all (modulo dead ends 2 and 3). They are all going in this chapter. But… the order… where… how do I build the bridges between them… This is a particularly painful dead end when you look at a mediocre chapter and realize that making it a decent chapter (and hence 1 more revision away from a good chapter) is a total rearrangement of the contents so broad it affects the entire conceptual set up.

I’m a little on the skids right now because my advisor told me I didn’t have to provide a fundamental theoretical grounding of anthropological epistemology just to present my census data. But something inside of me really tells me that’s what I need to do. I’m like “maybe just a little theoretical grounding? Please?”

Maybe I’ll do just a little bit more work tonight. Think this might be one of those evenings where I pace up and down and talk out loud. Yes. That might help. If you’ll excuse me…

At 200

by Alex

After a week at San Diego’s Melanesian Archive my dissertation has doubled in size, thanks to a warm and happy reception from Don, Joel, Kathy, and about 120 linear feet of pure Melanesian loving I like to call “DU 740 .42″. I’m getting closer and closer…

At 100

by Alex

As of today the dissertation is 100 pages long and I’ve still got a long way to go. Steady progress the past couple of days in more or less rough-draft type writing. As I move on to actually citing people and looking over my fieldnotes, it’s going to grow even more.

From Hyde Park to the Hotel Del

by Alex

My plan for world domiation proceeds apace even as my CV grows to fullness. I’ve just been granted cash money to fly out to San Diego to use the Melanesian Archive at the University of California San Diego. I am super excited – it is perhaps my own particular peculiarity that my idea of a good time is flying out to sunny SoCal and then spending 10 hours a day inside reading books. Last year the Melanesian Archive puchased a rare carbon copy of Jack Hides’ report of his 1934 Strickland-Purari patrol after they got the tip off from me that a copy was available for sale. Now I hope to have my picture taken with it. I already have a picture taken of me with John Black’s 1939 field diary from the Hagen-Sepik patrol. I might start putting up a gallery of Me With Famous Patrol Reports on my website. Anyhow San Diego has one of the coolest librarians around, as well as a number of Kind Melanesianists, so I’m psyched to be going out there and – hopefully – giving a talk. And best of all, they’re so accomodating they’ll actually fly me back in the library when I’m ready to return to Chicago. Go UCSD!

Anthropologists and Same-Sex Marriage

by Alex

The American Anthropology Association – the largest professional association of anthropologists in the world – has released a press statement in opposition to a constitutional ban on gay marriage. Although I am sometimes out of sympathy with my discipline, I couldn’t agree more with this press release.

In the past 100 years, our understanding of social organization, marriage and the family has increased by literally orders of magnitude. Historical, sociological, and ethnographic research has produced a body of work whose existence itself is one of the strongest reasons for recognizing the continuing relevance of social science. We have learned a tremendous amount about the multiple ways that people across time and throughout the world organize themselves, their lives, and their families.

Setting aside for a moment the important ethical and religious concerns that many people have about same-sex marriage, claims that ‘the family is the basis of civilization’ and that allowing same-sex marriage will ‘lead to the end of civilization’ are so vague that they simply fail to qualify as provable or disprovable (or even really discussable) at all. What, specifically, will go wrong? Will industrial production will decline? Will critical infrastructure no longer be maintained? Will the United States become depopulated? Will violent crime rise? White collar crime? I am unable to parse out this claim into any sort of hypothesis or prediction about future events sufficiently inteligible that it could be tested or analyzed in anything approaching a scientific manner.

Since I try to avoid politics on this blog, I don’t want to dwell at length on these questions. This is a contentious topic that inspires strong feelings on both sides. Many people oppose same-sex marriage on religious and moral grounds – as a religious person I am sympathetic to their concerns, although I myself support same-sex marriage. Perhaps there are many more articulate supporters of a ban on same-sex marriage who have made very explicit arguements regarding its concrete impact on Social Security or healthcare, but I’m not aware of this work. That is probably my fault.

But as an empirical proposition, my training and knowledge of the ethnographic record suggests that allowing two people of the same gender to share health care benefits will not result in measurable dysfunction in our economic, political, or social relations in this country. As the American Anthropological Association points out, “a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies.”

(Almost) Over the Hump

by Alex

Just one 30 page paper to go and I’ll be over the hump of the marathon paper giving and application spree that was this winter. Twenty pages to write in two days. Must. Keep. Going.

Political Representation in the Ancient Archaeological Built Environment For Newbies: A Mini-Course

by Alex

Hans-Georg Gadamer. The Ontological Foundation of the Occasional and the Decorative. in Truth and Method secions I.I.2 A,B, and C.

Wu Hung. Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and Architecture.

Adam T. Smith. Rendering the Political Aesthetic: Political Legitimacy in Urartian Representations of the Built Environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 19: 131-163. 2000.

Suggestions?

Internal Censor

by Alex

Here’s the top ten things I’ve wanted to say to professors this term, but which I couldn’t because they were professors and I wasn’t.

1. Just because you are all about Weber does not mean Weber is all about you.

2. Now I think you’re starting to make stuff up in your head a little bit there Dave.

3. That theorist matters to no one but you.

4. Just because you are famous does not automatically mean that you are also funny.

5. Um, while this discussion of Boas is all very interesting and all, everyone here has read all of the same books as you already. So maybe if you could skip giving your intro lecture on Boas and assume that we already know everything about that and kind of get to, well, you know, the point?

6. Although I find this lengthy digression into your own idiosyncratic take on Derrida stimulating, you may be interested to know that many people consider the term ‘mimesis’ to originate with Aristotle and have something to do with ‘poetics’.

7. David Schneider died in 1995. I am not David Schneider. You are arguing with someone who is no longer in the room.

8. Why say “we all know how deeply embedded legos are in the lifeworld of the child” when you could just say “we all know how much kids love legos”?

9. Should you really be allowed to write long articles about ‘the internet’ and ‘cyberculture’ when you can’t get your Eudora install to download your email from the IMAP server?

10. Shut it.