The Selling of the Last Savage

by Alex

It’s happened once again — another ‘first contact’ story from New Guinea. This time it’s an “article by Michael Behar”:http://outside.away.com/outside/destinations/200502/fist-contact_1.html in Outsider Magazine that’s recently been “featured on NPR”:http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4493348 . Sometimes anthropology’s knee-jerk, politically correct reactions drive me nuts, but in this case the article is so over the top that it’s difficult to take it — or Kelly Woolford, the tour operator it portrays — seriously at all. Lines about ‘stone age cannibals’ litter the pages.

This is particularly bothersome to me, since first contact in New Guinea is one of my academic specialities. I first got interested in the topic in 1995, when I wrote a “BA thesis”:http://library-catalog.reed.edu/search/aGolub&/agolub/1%2C33%2C46%2CB/frameset&FF=agolub+alex&1%2C1%2C comparing first-contact patrols in Papua New Guinea that occurred between 1926 and 1939. There is by now a burgeoning literature on the subject. Some of the books, such as “Like People You See In A Dream”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0804718997/qid=1108059528/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-7758230-2549624?v=glance&s=books and “The Sky Travellers”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0522848273/qid=1108059664/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-7758230-2549624?v=glance&s=books are among the best books ever written about New Guinea. Others, like “First Contact”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0670801674/qid=1108059741/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/002-7758230-2549624?v=glance&s=books are great yarns. Still others, like “The Lost Tribe”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0805053182/qid=1108059788/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-7758230-2549624?v=glance&s=books are wretched accounts of ignorant and unethical white guys dressing up their own bunglings as ‘adventure’. My own research on first contact in Porgera occupies a major part of my first book, “Gold Positive.”:http://uhmanoa.lib.hawaii.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=3&ti=1,3&SAB1=golub&BOOL1=all+of+these&FLD1=Keyword+Anywhere+%28GKEY%29+%28GKEY%29&GRP1=AND+with+next+set&SAB2=&BOOL2=all+of+these&FLD2=Keyword+Anywhere+%28GKEY%29+%28GKEY%29&GRP2=AND+with+next+set&SAB3=&BOOL3=all+of+these&FLD3=Keyword+Anywhere+%28GKEY%29+%28GKEY%29&PID=3966&CNT=25&SEQ=20050210082552&SID=1 I’ve even taught “a course”:http://library.kcc.hawaii.edu/external/psiweb/melanesia/First_Contact_Syllabus.htm on this topic at the University of Chicago (which is no small shakes). And this is not to mention the many classic travelogues that emerged from New Guinea that are still available to be read today: _Across New Guinea from the Fly to the Sepik_, _Papuan Wonderland_, _The Land That Time Forgot_, and so on.

In short, there is so much that we know and understand about first contanct in New Guinea — don’t even get me started on other parts of the world — that the appearence of this article and the universal condemnation of the tour operator described in it should be a relatively simple affair. But this is one dream that people are simply not willing to give up on, and so when what anthropologists say about this doesn’t match what they want to hear, they simply ignore it.

There’s so much wrong with this tour operator I really don’t know where to begin. But in case you were wondering: however cynical Behar is about this encounter, you should be even twice as cynical.